🔗 Share this article

Internationally, governments are pouring massive amounts into the concept of “sovereign AI” – creating national artificial intelligence technologies. From the city-state of Singapore to Malaysia and the Swiss Confederation, countries are competing to develop AI that understands local languages and cultural nuances.

The Worldwide AI Battle

This trend is an element in a broader international contest spearheaded by major corporations from the United States and the People's Republic of China. Whereas organizations like OpenAI and Meta allocate substantial resources, mid-sized nations are likewise making their own bets in the AI field.

Yet with such tremendous amounts at stake, is it possible for smaller states attain significant benefits? As stated by a specialist from a prominent research institute, If not you’re a wealthy government or a major firm, it’s a significant challenge to create an LLM from scratch.”

Security Considerations

Many countries are reluctant to depend on foreign AI models. In India, as an example, American-made AI tools have at times been insufficient. One case featured an AI tool used to teach learners in a remote community – it interacted in English with a thick American accent that was nearly-incomprehensible for local users.

Then there’s the state security factor. In India’s defence ministry, using particular international AI tools is seen as unacceptable. According to a founder explained, There might be some arbitrary data source that might say that, oh, Ladakh is separate from India … Employing that specific system in a military context is a serious concern.”

He further stated, I’ve discussed with experts who are in the military. They want to use AI, but, disregarding certain models, they prefer not to rely on US platforms because information may be transferred abroad, and that is absolutely not OK with them.”

Homegrown Initiatives

In response, several states are supporting domestic projects. An example such project is underway in India, in which a company is striving to develop a sovereign LLM with government support. This effort has committed approximately 1.25 billion dollars to artificial intelligence advancement.

The expert imagines a model that is more compact than leading tools from American and Asian corporations. He explains that India will have to make up for the resource shortfall with expertise. Based in India, we lack the option of pouring massive funds into it,” he says. “How do we vie versus for example the hundreds of billions that the United States is devoting? I think that is where the fundamental knowledge and the strategic thinking comes in.”

Native Priority

In Singapore, a government initiative is supporting AI systems educated in the region's regional languages. These languages – for example the Malay language, the Thai language, Lao, Bahasa Indonesia, Khmer and others – are commonly poorly represented in American and Asian LLMs.

I hope the individuals who are developing these sovereign AI systems were aware of how rapidly and just how fast the cutting edge is advancing.

A senior director participating in the initiative says that these tools are created to complement larger systems, as opposed to substituting them. Tools such as a popular AI tool and another major AI system, he states, commonly struggle with native tongues and cultural aspects – speaking in stilted Khmer, for instance, or suggesting non-vegetarian dishes to Malaysian individuals.

Developing native-tongue LLMs permits state agencies to code in local context – and at least be “knowledgeable adopters” of a powerful technology built elsewhere.

He adds, I am prudent with the word sovereign. I think what we’re attempting to express is we aim to be more accurately reflected and we want to comprehend the features” of AI platforms.

Cross-Border Collaboration

For countries trying to carve out a role in an intensifying global market, there’s a different approach: team up. Researchers affiliated with a prominent institution put forward a government-backed AI initiative allocated across a consortium of developing countries.

They refer to the initiative “Airbus for AI”, drawing inspiration from Europe’s successful initiative to build a alternative to Boeing in the mid-20th century. Their proposal would involve the creation of a public AI company that would merge the assets of different nations’ AI projects – such as the United Kingdom, Spain, Canada, Germany, the nation of Japan, the Republic of Singapore, South Korea, the French Republic, Switzerland and the Kingdom of Sweden – to establish a competitive rival to the Western and Eastern major players.

The lead author of a report describing the concept notes that the proposal has attracted the consideration of AI officials of at least a few countries so far, along with several state AI companies. While it is presently targeting “middle powers”, less wealthy nations – the nation of Mongolia and the Republic of Rwanda among them – have additionally shown curiosity.

He elaborates, In today’s climate, I think it’s an accepted truth there’s reduced confidence in the promises of the existing White House. Individuals are wondering like, is it safe to rely on any of this tech? What if they decide to